triosign.blogg.se - Filemaker baseelements 14 xml error

#Filemaker baseelements 14 xml error software
#Filemaker baseelements 14 xml error code

how much effort to put into deprecated or less adoptedīe frank, criticism is no good unless its critical.

what methods of authentication would this support?.

Now passes it to script Y, which does the same thing. Token to script X (which returns an authentication token), he

breaks out in song because instead of passing his developers.

Points his scripts at the FMauth version of the NewToken and.

configures and tests a service for JIra with the easy Setup.

The dev can re-write his own scripts, but first, he decides

later, Jira changes and only supports OAuth2, (the dev was.

writes individual scripts to get NewToken and RefreshToken.

But, for whatever reason, the dev does follows the guidelines.

dev decides the FMauth module will not suit their needs, so.

The dev wants to perform authentication actions, but does not.

Use Case: developer writes an API module for, say Jira.

#Filemaker baseelements 14 xml error code

as opposed to being written into the code of a larger script.Standalone scripts and be called when needed by other scripts. set an mFM guideline: these 3 actions should exist as.(I need to flesh this out - but I will continue this post.off the top of my head, lets say there are 3:.scope and determine the number of authentication actions.Useful (ALL feedback is GREATLY appreciated!) Here is what I think would need to happen to make this very So, I'm thinking about starting with an Authentication module.įMauth (working title) would allow devs to create, name and testĪuthentication methods for different services. FileMaker's technical limitations make collaboration difficult, perhaps unreasonable for mFM to tackle at the moment and GitHub as a way to do it is both technically problematic and goes over the heads of the vast majority of the target audience of FileMaker users. Many of the modules on are collaborative efforts, and a handful of them do use GitHub to achieve that, but it's really a pain in the butt compared to collaborative development with plain-text development tools. Making collaboration - multiple people developing the same module - easier is a worthy goal, but it's not quite what mFM is trying to accomplish, as I understand it. (There are modules written in the spirit of mFM that are not free-as-in-beer.) You appear to be conflating sharing with collaborating.

#Filemaker baseelements 14 xml error software

Usually, it's confusing "open source" software with "free" software - "free" as in speech vs. You're conflating values that often coexist, but are actually independent of each other. Jim, it sounds like you're falling into the same trap many folks working with open source software trip over.

Oh ya, you got any elephant shit I can shovel up for you? Shoveling up the elephant shit says "what, and give up show The world, cant you find a better job then this?", and the guy The guy on the corner says to him, "this must be the worst job in

The end of the parade is some schmuck shoveling up elephant shit. He asked me howĪ guy's standing on the corner, watching a circus parade go by. With a problem involving an attitude prone producer.

The first guy after me was Dave Simmerly. I've already got it in my system, I have an immunity). it was a crazy, hectic, place, which would driveĪnyone crazy (well, not me. "Indiana Jones And The Warentless Sequel")Īfter I left, they could not keep anyone in the position for more (you'll find my name on the credit of "War Of The Words", and They liked my work, I liked being an extra in EPII, I stayed - for 7 Now at ILM, called and asked me to come out and fix the (starwars) I was working at SFMOMA in 2000 when someone I used to work with,